Interviews > behaviour

• IntervieweePaper
• Inouye, David Inouye, D. W. (1978). Resource partitioning in bumblebees: experimental studies of foraging behavior. Ecology, 59(4), 672-678.
• Johnsingh, AJT Johnsingh, A. J. T. (1983). Large mammalian prey–predators in Bandipur. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 80: 1-57
• Kacelnik, Alex Weir, A. A., Chappell, J., & Kacelnik, A. (2002). Shaping of hooks in New Caledonian crows. Science, 297(5583), 981-981.
• Kempenaers, Bart Kempenaers, B., Verheyen, G. R., Van den Broeck, M., Burke, T., Van Broeckhoven, C., & Dhondt, A. (1992). Extra-pair paternity results from female preference for high-quality males in the blue tit. Nature, 357(6378), 494-496.
• Kilner, Rebecca Kilner, R. M., Noble, D. G., & Davies, N. B. (1999). Signals of need in parent–offspring communication and their exploitation by the common cuckoo. Nature 397: 667-672.
• Komdeur, Jan Komdeur, J., Daan, S., Tinbergen, J., & Mateman, C. (1997). Extreme adaptive modification in sex ratio of the Seychelles warbler's eggs. Nature, 385(6616), 522-525.
• Krebs, John Krebs, J. R., Erichsen, J. T., Webber, M. I., & Charnov, E. L. (1977). Optimal prey selection in the great tit (Parus major). Animal Behaviour, 25, 30-38.
• Lala, Kevin Laland, K., Uller, T., Feldman, M., Sterelny, K., Müller, G., Moczek, A., Jablonka, E. & Odling-Smee, J. (2015). The extended evolutionary synthesis: its structure, assumptions and predictions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1813), 20151019.
• Le Boeuf, Burney Le Boeuf, B. J. (1974). Male-male competition and reproductive success in elephant seals. American Zoologist, 163-176.
• Milinski, Manfred Milinski, M., & Bakker, T. C. (1990). Female sticklebacks use male coloration in mate choice and hence avoid parasitized males. Nature, 344(6264), 330.
• Moller, Anders Møller, A. P. (1988). Female choice selects for male sexual tail ornaments in the monogamous swallow. Nature, 332(6165), 640-642.
• Nagendra, Harini Ostrom, E., & Nagendra, H. (2006). Insights on linking forests, trees, and people from the air, on the ground, and in the laboratory. Proceedings of the national Academy of sciences, 103(51), 19224-19231.
• Nosil, Patrick Nosil, P., Crespi, B. J., & Sandoval, C. P. (2002). Host-plant adaptation drives the parallel evolution of reproductive isolation. Nature, 417(6887), 440-443.
• Packer, Craig Packer, C., Scheel, D., & Pusey, A. E. (1990). Why lions form groups: food is not enough. The American Naturalist, 136(1), 1-19.
• Perrins, Christopher Perrins, C. M. (1965). Population fluctuations and clutch-size in the Great Tit, Parus major L. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 601-647.
• Petrie, Marion Petrie, M., Tim, H., & Carolyn, S. (1991). Peahens prefer peacocks with elaborate trains. Animal Behaviour, 41: 323-331.
• Ryan, Michael Ryan, M. J., Fox, J. H., Wilczynski, W., & Rand, A. S. (1990). Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus. Nature, 343(6253), 66-67.
• Schmitz, Oswald Schmitz, O. J., Beckerman, A. P., & O’Brien, K. M. (1997). Behaviorally mediated trophic cascades: effects of predation risk on food web interactions. Ecology, 78(5), 1388-1399.
• Seehausen, Ole Seehausen, O., Van Alphen, J. J., & Witte, F. (1997). Cichlid fish diversity threatened by eutrophication that curbs sexual selection. Science, 277(5333), 1808-1811.
• Shine, Richard Shine, R. (1980). “Costs” of reproduction in reptiles. Oecologia, 46(1), 92-100.